Comment Problems
Information Literacy and Habits of Mind

Accessibility and Learning

As I've mentioned previously, I'm working with a couple of clients right now who work with individuals with disabilities on some social media projects and it continues to be a learning experience. For the past week I've been hard at work pulling together a wiki for a 2.5 day workshop we're doing in August on using social media in Centers for Independent Living. We're adapting Beth Kanter's fabulous WeAreMedia curriculum,  focusing on how the tools can be used within a community with varying challenges to accessing the technology. In particular, I'm finding that there are a lot of challenges to using social media with people who have visual disabilities. Here's some of what I'm learning:

  • The convention of having links that say "As I've mentioned previously" (see my first sentence) or "go here" does not work for individuals with visual disabilities who are using a screen reader to navigate the web. They need links that are descriptive---that say where you're linking too. This is actually good SEO practice, too, but something I continually have struggled to stop doing as I'm so used to making links out of vague references, as I did above.
  • I'm used to embedding Slideshare and YouTube videos directly into my wiki handouts so that people don't have to navigate away from the site to access them. For individuals with visual disabilities, though, this is a problem. They can't advance through Slideshare slides or hit the "play" button on a YouTube video because their screen readers can't give them the information they need to do this. For them, an embedded video is just a frustrating blank in the wiki page.
  • Speaking of Slideshare, many of the great presentations on Slideshare make extensive use of photos and graphics to illustrate their points. I find this to be particularly true of technology presentations where there are lots of screenshots and Flickr photos being used. While this is obviously a great way for sighted people to learn about the tools,  if you have a visual impairment, visuals aren't going to be very helpful. 
  • Often when I do wiki handouts, I'll use photos to add some visual interest to the page. VIsuals on a page are OK for screen readers, as long as they've been properly tagged so that the screen reader can identify it as either decorative or illustrative of a point and there's some indication of what the photo is about. Unfortunately, Wikispaces isn't giving me that option (or at least I didn't find a way to do this), so I've ended up removing all of the photos to avoid confusion. BTW--this is also an issue for those of us who use photos in our blogs, which may make it more difficult for people with visual impairments to navigate our posts.

The biggest shift for me has been needing to think in very different ways about my materials and how to make them accessible. This project has been a huge reminder to me too of how visual I am in my development of materials, which can be great in some cases, but in others requires a big shift in my thinking.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thank you for introducing me to Beth Kanter's blog and the WeAreMedia curriculum. I teach in a social work program and these tools are perfect for macro or community practice. Your blog inspires and informs my work. Thank you!

Glad that the pointer to WeAreMedia and Beth's blog was helpful, Leslie--they are GREAT resources. And thanks for reading BP!

I think you are addressing the issue that any instructor needs to deal with (whether their students have disabilities or not): choosing the correct platform. I used the Ning last semester and really liked many of the features. However, some of my students had difficulty with it in terms of technology interface. Those with a slow connection had trouble uploading documents (they kept getting bumped off).

I wonder if you used a different wiki platform if it would be easier. I know a colleague uses adobe for a number of things because of it's voice reader. If you were to go audio clip (i.e. make documents available through Apple University or making mp3 clips) might that be more accessible? Is wikispaces too limiting? Are there other wikis that are more accessible to people with disabilities? Like you, I would never have thought there would be a problem tagging or with students accessing YouTube with readers. Are wikis even the right format? Is this the same with Ning, for example, or facebook? And how do we find out these attributes or look for them if we are designing for customers/ students with disabilities?

The comments to this entry are closed.